Is there anyone from ASPEWS on this list?

Seth Mattinen sethm at
Fri Dec 11 20:48:35 CST 2009

William Pitcock wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 23:39 +0000, John Levine wrote:
>>> ASPEWS is listing as being associated with the whole
>>> Atrivo incident of 2008.  My memory does not recall being
>>> involved, nor the provider that belongs to.
>> Since nobody but the occasional highly vocal GWL uses ASPEWS, it's
>> hard to see why one would care, but if you want to find ASPEWS, crank
>> up your favorite usenet program, post a question to nanae, and watch
>> the vitriol roll in.  There might be a comment from ASPEWS in there.
> Well, I just want to reach SORBS to clear up some confusion regarding
> what ranges of mine are dynamic (e.g. none of them, but they seem to
> think otherwise).  Unfortunately, e-mail to SORBS bounces due to
> being listed in ASPEWS as being "part of Atrivo".

You should still be able to submit a ticket to SORBS, no? I was always 
under the impression that it was "open a ticket and wait or you are 
moved to the back of the line" with SORBS.


More information about the NANOG mailing list