Is there anyone from ASPEWS on this list?
nenolod at systeminplace.net
Fri Dec 11 19:43:24 CST 2009
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 23:39 +0000, John Levine wrote:
> >ASPEWS is listing 188.8.131.52/20 as being associated with the whole
> >Atrivo incident of 2008. My memory does not recall 184.108.40.206/20 being
> >involved, nor the provider that belongs to.
> Since nobody but the occasional highly vocal GWL uses ASPEWS, it's
> hard to see why one would care, but if you want to find ASPEWS, crank
> up your favorite usenet program, post a question to nanae, and watch
> the vitriol roll in. There might be a comment from ASPEWS in there.
Well, I just want to reach SORBS to clear up some confusion regarding
what ranges of mine are dynamic (e.g. none of them, but they seem to
think otherwise). Unfortunately, e-mail to SORBS bounces due to
ethr.net being listed in ASPEWS as being "part of Atrivo".
I think it is kind of fail that RBL people do not have e-mail based
contact addresses. Snoozenet is unpleasant to deal with.
More information about the NANOG