Is there anyone from ASPEWS on this list?

William Pitcock nenolod at
Fri Dec 11 19:43:24 CST 2009

On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 23:39 +0000, John Levine wrote:
> >ASPEWS is listing as being associated with the whole
> >Atrivo incident of 2008.  My memory does not recall being
> >involved, nor the provider that belongs to.
> Since nobody but the occasional highly vocal GWL uses ASPEWS, it's
> hard to see why one would care, but if you want to find ASPEWS, crank
> up your favorite usenet program, post a question to nanae, and watch
> the vitriol roll in.  There might be a comment from ASPEWS in there.

Well, I just want to reach SORBS to clear up some confusion regarding
what ranges of mine are dynamic (e.g. none of them, but they seem to
think otherwise).  Unfortunately, e-mail to SORBS bounces due to being listed in ASPEWS as being "part of Atrivo".

I think it is kind of fail that RBL people do not have e-mail based
contact addresses.  Snoozenet is unpleasant to deal with.


More information about the NANOG mailing list