Beware: a very bad precedent set
Mark Andrews
marka at isc.org
Mon Aug 31 22:12:33 UTC 2009
In message <4A9C45D2.1000605 at brightok.net>, Jack Bates writes:
> nanog at wbsconnect.com wrote:
> > Any and all nefarious activity alleged in this lawsuit was conducted by a c
> ustomer, of a customer, of a customer yet the hosting provider was found liab
> le, not the actual criminal manufacturing and selling the fakes.
> >
> > We had all better watch our backs since it seems that claims of not being a
> ble to inspected tens of millions of packets per second is no longer a viable
> excuse.
> >
>
> Hmmm. I thought DMCA made it quite clear that a service provider cannot
> ignore reports.
>
> "The Akanoc Defendantsâ specific business model of providing unmanaged
> server capacity to web hosting resellers does not exempt them from
> taking active steps to effectively prevent infringing activity upon
> notification from an intellectual property rights owner. "
>
> I consider that the more important statement in the article. The "upon
notification" being the largest issue. Don't know if DMCA covers
> anything outside the scope of copyright, but I think it's been generally
> accepted that ignoring reports of infringement can bring about liability.
>
> Jack
It will be interesting to see the court cases against ISP's that
don't shutdown other illegal activities once they have been notified.
abuse@ better not be a blackhole or you are putting yourself at risk
based on this.
Mark
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka at isc.org
More information about the NANOG
mailing list