FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband
Peter Beckman
beckman at angryox.com
Fri Aug 28 15:14:08 UTC 2009
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> In most areas of the country you can't get a permit to build a house
> without electrical service (something solar and other off the grid people
> are fighting). Since it is so much more cost effective to install with
> new construction, why don't we have codes requring Cat5 drops in every
> room, and fiber to the home for all new construction?
And where does that fiber go to? Home runs from a central point in the
development, so any provider can hook up to any house at the street?
Deregulation means those lines should be accessible to any company for a
fee. How do you give House A Verizon and House B Cox, especially if Cox
doesn't support fiber?
Granted, I don't do residential broadband deployments, maybe all of those
issues are trivial, but something that needs to be considered. Just
because there is only one player in a certain market now doesn't mean we
shouldn't plan now for 10 players 10 years from now in the same market.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Beckman Internet Guy
beckman at angryox.com http://www.angryox.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the NANOG
mailing list