FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband

Frank Bulk - iName.com frnkblk at iname.com
Thu Aug 27 20:35:57 CDT 2009


Estimates to bring FTTH to all of America is in the $100 to $300B range.

So yes, the $7.2B is a drop in the bucket.

Frank

-----Original Message-----
From: Sean Donelan [mailto:sean at donelan.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 9:53 PM
To: nanog at nanog.org
Subject: Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband

On Wed, 26 Aug 2009, Fred Baker wrote:
> If it's about stimulus money, I'm in favor of saying that broadband
implies 
> fiber to the home. That would provide all sorts of stimuli to the economy
- 
> infrastructure, equipment sales, jobs digging ditches, and so on. I could 
> pretty quickly argue myself into suggesting special favors for deployment
of 
> DNSSEC, multicast, and IPv6. As in, use the stimulus money to propel a
leap 
> forward, not just waste it.

Broadband stimulus money = $7,200,000,000

Housing units in USA (2000) = 115,904,641

Stimulus money per housing unit = $62.12 one-time

What definition of "broadband" can you achieve for that amount of money?

Or for rural housing units (2000) = 25,938,698

Stimulus money per rural housing unit = $277.58 one-time

What definition of "broadband" can you achieve for that amount of money 
in a rural build-out?

How much will fiber to the home cost in a rural area?






More information about the NANOG mailing list