IPv6 Addressing Help
Nathan Ward
nanog at daork.net
Sat Aug 15 07:03:05 UTC 2009
On 15/08/2009, at 4:34 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> I'm going to contradict you there. Classful addressing had a lot to
>> recommend it. The basic problem we ran in to was that there weren't
>> enough B's for everyone who needed more than a C and there weren't
>> enough A's period. So we started handing out groups of disaggregate
>> C's and that path led to the swamp.
>
> the swamp preceeded cidr
>
> and, if you had a bit of simple arithmetic clue, you would realize
> that,
> unless you are prescient, you will always run out of some classes
> before
> others. as we are very poor at predicting the future, there was no
> win
> to be had in classful.
This is really this basis of my reply, so, I'll just say +1
Read about how sparse allocation/binary chop stuff works. You get the
same amount of routes in your IGP table (or less) but it's much more
flexible.
--
Nathan Ward
More information about the NANOG
mailing list