Sprint/Verizon BGP

Christopher Morrow morrowc.lists at gmail.com
Wed Aug 5 10:48:09 CDT 2009


On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Robert D. Scott<robert at ufl.edu> wrote:
> They will almost always prefer their IBGP to any learned routes.  Why send
> traffic to a transit network and skew their I/O peering numbers when you can
> handle it yourself. I doubt you will change their mind.

http://onesc.net/communities/as1239/

uhm, prepend and/or localpref fiddling...

-chris

> Robert D. Scott                 Robert at ufl.edu
> Senior Network Engineer         352-273-0113 Phone
> CNS - Network Services          352-392-2061 CNS Phone Tree
> University of Florida           352-392-9440 FAX
> Florida Lambda Rail             352-294-3571 FLR NOC
> Gainesville, FL  32611          321-663-0421 Cell
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Edward Brookhouse [mailto:ebroo at setuidzero.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 11:36 AM
> To: nanog at nanog.org
> Subject: Sprint/Verizon BGP
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> Any Sprint BGP admins on this list can offer any thoughts on why Sprint
> connected networks are preferring my Sprint connection when they should be
> preferring my Verizon?
>
>
>
> I (Healthy Directions) am AS16387, two blocks 63.73.158.0/24 and
> 63.78.31.0/24, being announced by sprint and Verizon, preferred to
> Verizon(DS3) over Sprint 3MB.
>
>
>
> Verizon BGP admins think everything is ok, have not heard back from BGP4 at
> sprint.
>
>
>
> Any thoughts appreciated, off-list contact welcome.
>
>
>
> Edward
>
> ebroo at healthydirections.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>




More information about the NANOG mailing list