DNS alternatives (was Re: Dan Kaminsky)
Roland Dobbins
rdobbins at arbor.net
Wed Aug 5 15:24:56 UTC 2009
On Aug 5, 2009, at 10:11 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> For all it's short comings the DNS and the single namespace it
> brings is much better than
> having a multitude of namespaces.
I agree with you, but I don't think this approach is going to persist
as the standard model.
Increasingly, transport and what we now call layer-7 are going to
become conflated (we already see all these Rube Goldberg-type
mechanisms to try and accomplish this OOB now, with predictable
results), and that's going to lead to APIs/data types embedding this
information, IMHO.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
Unfortunately, inefficiency scales really well.
-- Kevin Lawton
More information about the NANOG
mailing list