Dan Kaminsky
Dragos Ruiu
dr at kyx.net
Tue Aug 4 21:31:13 UTC 2009
On 3-Aug-09, at 9:43 PM, andrew.wallace wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Read my post one more time and think though: Only "zf0" are legally
> in the shit.
>
> The guy "Dragos Ruiu" has absolutely no case against me.
>
> Copy & paste doesn't count as defamation, speak to Wired's legal team
> if you have an issue.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Andrew
>
Whoa. Feeling a tad defensive? ;-P
I used slander specifically. Any defamation from referenced emails is
short-lived. ;-)
cheers,
--dr
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 2:02 AM, Richard A Steenbergen<ras at e-
> gerbil.net> wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 01:11:17PM -0700, Cord MacLeod wrote:
>>> I don't see a video attached or an audio recording. Thus no
>>> slander.
>>>
>>> Libel on the other hand is a different matter.
>>
>> You have those backwards. Slander is transitory (i.e. spoken)
>> defamation, libel is written/recorded/etc non-transitory defamation.
>> This seems like a group that could benefit from knowing those two
>> words.
>> :)
>>
>> --
>> Richard A Steenbergen <ras at e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
>> GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA
>> F8B1 2CBC)
>>
>>
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list