The Cidr Report

Geoff Huston gih at apnic.net
Sat Aug 1 04:27:06 CDT 2009


On 01/08/2009, at 6:44 PM, Paul Rolland (ポール・ロラン) wrote:

> Hi Patrick,
>
> On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 18:22:37 -0400
> "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick at ianai.net> wrote:
>
>> On Jul 31, 2009, at 6:00 PM, cidr-report at potaroo.net wrote:
>>
>>> Recent Table History
>>>       Date      Prefixes    CIDR Agg
>>>       24-07-09    298785      182835
>>>       25-07-09    299168      182751
>>>       26-07-09    298909      182973
>>>       27-07-09    299265      183099
>>>       28-07-09    299345      183207
>>>       29-07-09    299380      182987
>>>       30-07-09    299354      183395
>>>       31-07-09    299904      183680
>>
>> Only 94 prefixes short!
> You mean 96, or is 299998 important to you ? ;)
>
>> Any bets on whether next tomorrow is THREE HUNDRED (thousand) day?
>> Careful what you say, we actually dropped prefixes Wed -> Thurs this
>> week.
> Don't invite people to "leak", you can be sure one of them will try  
> to be
> the one who "helped" reach the 300K range :(

done! Right now its 300002 entries from this vantage point.

In amidst the teeming morass of updates of existing announced  
prefixes, sorting out the exact announcement of a new prefix that took  
the table over 300000 entries will take a little time to work out.


    Geoff







More information about the NANOG mailing list