Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests

Tue Apr 21 02:07:25 UTC 2009

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Apr 20, 2009, at 9:04 PM, David Andersen wrote:

> Just a thought:  A technical person might be very happy to lie to a  
> toothless organization that holds no real sway over him or her,  
> won't revoke the address space once granted, and for whom the  
> benefit of lots of address space in which to play exceeds any  
> potential pain from being caught, er, exaggerating their need for  
> address space.
>
> That same technical person might be less inclined to lie to a  
> director of their company who asks:  "Are you asking me to attest,  
> publicly and perhaps legally, that this information is correct?  If  
> you're wrong and you make an ass of me, it's going to be yours that  
> goes out the door."
>
> Seems like a reasonable experiment to try, at least.

I agree there is no harm in the idea but as I was reading the  
announcement this morning I couldn't help but think "Too little, too  
late".

Chris

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chris Owen         - Garden City (620) 275-1900 -  Lottery (noun):
President          - Wichita     (316) 858-3000 -    A stupidity tax
Hubris Communications Inc      www.hubris.net
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
Comment: Public Key: http://home.hubris.net/owenc/pgpkey.txt
Comment: Public Key ID: 0xB513D9DD

iEYEARECAAYFAkntKl0ACgkQElUlCLUT2d0engCgk3EJW7uu0j9p0ArLjRmZHseP
cLMAnRqYov8CwxkF1E1pxP4zktUhA+HS
=i5o1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----