IXP

Fri Apr 17 22:10:41 UTC 2009

On 18.04.2009 00:04 Paul Vixie wrote

>>> the 300-peer IXP's i've been associated with weren't quite full
>>> mesh in terms of who actually wanted to peer with whom, so, no.
>> 
>> Much depends on your definition of "quite". Would 30% qualify?
> 
> 30% would be an over-the-top success.  has anybody ever run out of 1Q
> tags in an IXP context?

Why? You only need 1 ;-)


Arnold
-- 
Arnold Nipper / nIPper consulting, Sandhausen, Germany
email: arnold at nipper.de       phone: +49 6224 9259 299
mobile: +49 172 2650958         fax: +49 6224 9259 333

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 250 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20090418/c710aa58/attachment.sig>