[OT] Re: Fiber cut in SF area
Peter Beckman
beckman at angryox.com
Sun Apr 12 03:59:30 UTC 2009
On Sat, 11 Apr 2009, Lamar Owen wrote:
> The locking covers I have seen here put the lock(s) on the inside cover cam
> jackscrew (holes through the jackscrew close to the inside cover seal rod
> nut), rather than on the outside cover, thus keeping the padlocks out of the
> weather.
I'm starting to wonder what makes more sense -- locking down
thousands of miles of underground tunnel with mil-spec expensive locks
that ideally keep unauthorized people out, OR simple motion and or video
cameras in the tunnels themselves which relay their access back to a
central facility, along with a video feed of sorts, to help identify who
is there, whether approved or not.
With locks, you know they gained access after the fact and that your
locking wasn't sufficient enough. With active monitoring of the area
where the cables live, you at least know the moment someone goes in, and
have some lead time (and maybe a video) to do something to prevent it, or
catch them in the act.
Unfortunately, that kind of monitoring is also expensive and complex. I
wonder what the cost of the outage was, and how much it might cost to
monitor it? Would it be worth $2,000 per site per year?
A great webcam, with day/night capability, and a cell phone, in a locked
box, with a solar panel, on top of a pole, near the site. Sure, if you
know it's there, taking it out is easy, but someone will still know
something is wrong when it goes dark or the picture changes significantly.
Are there some low-cost, highly-effective ways that the tunnels which
carry our precious data and communications can at least be monitored
remotely? Waiting for someone to cut a cable and then deploying a crew
seems reactive, whereas knowing the moment someone goes INTO the tunnel is
proactive, whether the person(s) are there to do some normal maintenance
or something malicious.
Beckman
I suppose rats and other rodents could cause such a system to be too
annoying to pay attention to.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Beckman Internet Guy
beckman at angryox.com http://www.angryox.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the NANOG
mailing list