Wow, just when you though big government was someone else's problem

• Previous message (by thread): Wow, just when you though big government was someone else's problem
• Next message (by thread): Wow, just when you though big government was someone else's problem
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, 05 Apr 2009 12:58:50 EDT, Michael Barker said:
> Seems like they're following up on Department of Defense Directive 8570.01,
> whereas all Information Assurance personnel (that being defined as anyone
> with privileged access) are required to be certified.

Sort of what I was worried about - "Providers of cybersecurity services" and
"has privileged access" aren't exactly the same thing.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20090405/65011472/attachment.sig>

• Previous message (by thread): Wow, just when you though big government was someone else's problem
• Next message (by thread): Wow, just when you though big government was someone else's problem
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]