Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer

Matt Jonkman jonkman at jonkmans.com
Sun Sep 21 18:58:21 CDT 2008


I will do so. Look forward to the tour.

Matt

Russell Mitchell wrote:
> Matt:
> I've already put this offer up. I'll be more then happy to meet up at
> our datacenter and take you through our space.
> What I find funny is, your the first one whom participated in the recent
> reports to actually take up and respond to us.
> I've emailed Garth and Jart, and both of them refused to respond.
>  
> I emailed both of them requesting the same information they gave to
> Directi. If they were able to provide Directi with a list of 20,000+
> domains from their control that were abusive, why can't they provide US
> directly with a single 1?
>  
> Then, release a joint-statement talking about how the companies need to
> come together to combat the abusive activities across the net, yet when
> we extend our hand and open up our network, we don't even get a response!
>  
> Directi went from being a "partner in crime" with us to being a great
> anti-abuse supporting company. How can YOU claim that WE don't do
> anything, if you won't report your findings in the first place? Got
> recent stuff? Why are you willing to give it now that we're OFFLINE?
> What can we do about it NOW at this very minute?
>  
> You tell me when your going to be in San Francisco, and I'll make myself
> available.
>  
> Thank you for your time. Have a great day.
>  
> ---
> Russell Mitchell
> InterCage, Inc.
>  
> P.S. I just realized all my responses to earlier people like Gadi and
> them were direct and not cc to NANOG. Will "Reply to all" now :)
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Matt Jonkman <jonkman at jonkmans.com>
> To: Russell Mitchell <russm2k8 at yahoo.com>
> Cc: nanog at nanog.org
> Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2008 4:02:15 PM
> Subject: Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer
> 
> Russell Mitchell wrote:
>> -----
>>
>> Matt:
>> It's very sad that your PROUD of you contribution to the supposed
> "white paper" on our company. I'd like to know, was any of your
> "contribution" to the report altered, or mis-represented, or are you
> truly unaware of how false the information you provided was?
>> Care to have verified it? or are you a Spamhaus admin like John Reid
> who has that magic stick to make a claim and attack anyone who objects
> to it with the truth?
> 
> I'd love to, but nanog isn't the place. I'll be in san fran in the near
> future. Lets sit down over a beer, I'll bring the research and you can
> look it over yourself. That would be far more productive than this. I
> think a few other folks would love to meet up with you as well. Maybe
> Emil can join us too?
> 
> It's easy to insinuate from behind a keyboard. Lets get down to facts.
> 
> But take this off nanog. This is NOT the place for it. Let me know when
> you'l be in town, I'll schedule my travel in that direction to meet up soon.
> 
> Matt
> 
> -- 
> --------------------------------------------
> Matthew Jonkman
> Emerging Threats
> Phone 765-429-0398
> Fax 312-264-0205
> http://www.emergingthreats.net <http://www.emergingthreats.net/>
> --------------------------------------------
> 
> PGP: http://www.jonkmans.com/mattjonkman.asc
> 
> 
> 

-- 
--------------------------------------------
Matthew Jonkman
Emerging Threats
Phone 765-429-0398
Fax 312-264-0205
http://www.emergingthreats.net
--------------------------------------------

PGP: http://www.jonkmans.com/mattjonkman.asc






More information about the NANOG mailing list