Atrivo/Intercage: Now Only 1 Upstream
Tomas L. Byrnes
tomb at byrneit.net
Wed Sep 17 21:17:36 CDT 2008
Welcome the Internet version of "Too big to fail".
I like the corollary: If it's too big to fail, it's too big, and needs
to be broken up.
Otherwise, we get an oligarchy,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Seth Mattinen [mailto:sethm at rollernet.us]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 11:27 AM
> To: nanog at nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Atrivo/Intercage: Now Only 1 Upstream
> Lamar Owen wrote:
> > On Wednesday 17 September 2008 13:34:22 Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> >> On Sep 17, 2008, at 1:32 PM, David Ulevitch wrote:
> >>> At the end of the day, nobody is going to drop packets
> for amazon's
> >>> IP space.
> >> I'm afraid reality disagrees with you - there already are networks
> >> doing it.
> > Indeed. Google's e-mail servers get on the various DNSBL's
> I occasionally get in to an argument with a customer who is
> trying to get mail from someone after a spam run came out of
> a google mail server and landed it on a DNSBL. The argument
> presented to me always boils down to "Google could never do
> anything wrong" or "Google is too big to do anything wrong"
> and I should immediately stop recommending any DNSBL that
> would dare to block Google.
More information about the NANOG