only WV FIBER now peering with Atrivo / Intercage

Christian Koch christian at broknrobot.com
Sat Sep 6 20:32:39 CDT 2008


On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Anton Kapela <tkapela at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 6:33 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore <patrick at ianai.net> wrote:
>
>> Anton's post that GX is still providing them transit is a bit curious, since
>> I was under the impression GX had severed all ties with Atrivo.  But the
>> table does not lie, a path of "174 3549 27595" is clearly transit.  GX, care
>> to comment?
>
> After poking for a bit, it's unclear what, if anything, GX is or isn't
> doing here.
>
> I tossed a static /24 towards the upstream sending the AS path with GX
> in it, and traced towards a host in the that /24 - the traceroute
> output disagrees with the as path, oddly enough.
>
> bgp routes, again:
>
> r> 58.65.238.0/24   71.13.116.101   100   0   20115 19151 27595 i
> r                          204.11.128.105   100   0   33125 174 3549 27595 i
>
> actual path is cogent, (3), wv, intercage, not cogent, gx, intercage:
>
> Tracing the route to 58-65-238-1.myrdns.com (58.65.238.1)
>
>  1 204.11.128.105 [AS 33125] 0 msec 0 msec 0 msec
>  2 gi2-15.ccr02.ord03.atlas.cogentco.com (38.104.102.29) [AS 174] 4
> msec 4 msec 8 msec
>  3 te-9-1.car4.Chicago1.Level3.net (4.68.127.129) [AS 3356] 4 msec 8
> msec 4 msec
>  4 ae-32-56.ebr2.Chicago1.Level3.net (4.68.101.190) [AS 3356] 8 msec
> 20 msec 16 msec
>  5 ae-5.ebr2.Chicago2.Level3.net (4.69.140.194) [AS 3356] 8 msec 4 msec 8 msec
>  6 ae-2.ebr2.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.132.70) [AS 3356] 40 msec
> 36 msec 36 msec
>  7 ae-72-72.csw2.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.134.150) [AS 3356] 36 msec
>    ae-82-82.csw3.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.134.154) [AS 3356] 40 msec
>    ae-92-92.csw4.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.134.158) [AS 3356] 40 msec
>  8 ae-14-69.car4.Washington1.Level3.net (4.68.17.6) [AS 3356] 28 msec
>    ae-24-79.car4.Washington1.Level3.net (4.68.17.70) [AS 3356] 32 msec
>    ae-34-89.car4.Washington1.Level3.net (4.68.17.134) [AS 3356] 32 msec
>  9 CWIE-LLC.car4.Washington1.Level3.net (4.79.170.146) [AS 3356] 32
> msec 32 msec 28 msec
>  10  *  *  *
>  11 atl-ten3-1-ash-ten3-1.wvfiber.net (66.216.1.157) [AS 19151] [MPLS:
> Label 120 Exp 0] 216 msec 208 msec 188 msec
>  12 nsh-ten4-1-atl-ten3-2.wvfiber.net (64.127.130.58) [AS 19151]
> [MPLS: Label 73 Exp 0] 32 msec 32 msec 32 msec
>  13 la-ten1-1-nsh-ten4-2.wvfiber.net (66.186.197.109) [AS 19151]
> [MPLS: Label 113 Exp 0] 80 msec 80 msec 80 msec
>  14 sjc-ten1-1-la-ten1-2.wvfiber.net (66.186.197.106) [AS 19151] 80
> msec 84 msec 80 msec
>  15 58-65-238-1.myrdns.com (58.65.238.1) 84 msec 132 msec 104 msec
>
> question I have for the list is...who's faking the funk?

second that...

from ripe bgplay view, gx is never seen as an adjacency to 27595, just
wv and bandcon, with liteup being brought up later on in the 2 day
interval

http://www.ris.ripe.net/cgi-bin/bgplay.cgi?prefix=58.65.238.0/24&start=2008-09-05+01:15&end=2008-09-07+01:15



> -Tk
>
>

-christian




More information about the NANOG mailing list