GLBX De-Peers Intercage [Was: RE: Washington Post: Atrivo/Intercag e, w hy are we peering with the American RBN?]
Justin Shore
justin at justinshore.com
Tue Sep 2 22:07:13 UTC 2008
Paul Ferguson wrote:
> My next question to the peanut gallery is: What do you
> suggest we should do on other hosting IP blocks are are continuing
> to host criminal activity, even in the face of abuse reports, etc.?
>
> Seriously -- I think this is an issue which needs to be addressed
> here. ISPs cannot continue to sweep this issue under the proverbial
> carpet.
>
> Is this an issue that network operations folk don't really care
> about?
IMHO policy should only be dictated by the edge, never upstream of that
point. Now whether the edge is defined as the edge provider or the
actual end-user is up for debate. I don't want my upstreams to make a
decision what my SP and thus my customers can get to. My customers
can't contact my upstream and argue for listing or delisting a given IP
like they can with me. They can't speak with their dollars to my
upstream like that can with me, their edge provider. Then again should
I as the edge provider filter for my customers? Value-add service or a
bonus service? It depends on your point of view.
Justin
More information about the NANOG
mailing list