GLBX De-Peers Intercage [Was: RE: Washington Post: Atrivo/Intercag e, w hy are we peering with the American RBN?]

Mon Sep 1 09:53:22 UTC 2008

On Mon, 1 Sep 2008, Paul Ferguson wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> - -- "Paul Ferguson" <fergdawg at netzero.net> wrote:
>
>> -- "Marc Sachs" <marc at sans.org> wrote:
>
>>> http://cidr-report.org/cgi-bin/as-report?as=AS27595&v=4&view=2.0
>
>>
>> My only concern here is that by the publicity this issue continues
>> to receive, these activities will just move else where, like
>> scurrying cockroaches (like what happened with AS40989).
>>
>
> [some elided]
>
> I guess my effort to evoke commentary on NANOG failed.
>
> My next question to the peanut gallery is: What do you
> suggest we should do on other hosting IP blocks are are continuing
> to host criminal activity, even in the face of abuse reports, etc.?
>
> Seriously -- I think this is an issue which needs to be addressed
> here. ISPs cannot continue to sweep this issue under the proverbial
> carpet.
>
> Is this an issue that network operations folk don't really care
> about?

NANOG is on vacation. Wait one more day. :)

> - - ferg
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.3 (Build 3017)
>
> wj8DBQFIu6xHq1pz9mNUZTMRAo1gAKCT0QCc65W1z8C5gsegsm6zBWDDCwCeLKac
> 7nVL8XmqOZiFfD18hFSFL/M=
> =8pXG
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> --
> "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
> Engineering Architecture for the Internet
> fergdawg(at)netzero.net
> ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
>
>
>