spurring transition to ipv6 -- make it faster

Nathan Ward nanog at daork.net
Sat Oct 18 00:23:25 UTC 2008

On 18/10/2008, at 12:18 AM, Michael Simpson wrote:

> On 10/16/08, Truman Boyes <truman at suspicious.org> wrote:
>> It's a good point that you brought up.
>> Even though we already have IPv6 P2P (Nathan's post explains this  
>> in more
>> detail), it would still be quite interesting to provide IPv6 as a  
>> higher
>> class of traffic within service provider networks.
> As long as none of your ipv6 traffic transits across anything from
> British Telecom
> as it is not supported on their 21st Century Network
> <http://aaisp.blogspot.com/2008/10/bts-21st-century-network-apparently-not.html 
> >

Yeah, except Teredo and 6to4 solve that problem for us today and are  
enabled by default on Vista and are used by p2p applications.


Nathan Ward

More information about the NANOG mailing list