spurring transition to ipv6 -- make it faster

Nathan Ward nanog at daork.net
Fri Oct 17 19:23:25 CDT 2008


On 18/10/2008, at 12:18 AM, Michael Simpson wrote:

> On 10/16/08, Truman Boyes <truman at suspicious.org> wrote:
>> It's a good point that you brought up.
>>
>> Even though we already have IPv6 P2P (Nathan's post explains this  
>> in more
>> detail), it would still be quite interesting to provide IPv6 as a  
>> higher
>> class of traffic within service provider networks.
>>
>
> As long as none of your ipv6 traffic transits across anything from
> British Telecom
> as it is not supported on their 21st Century Network
>
> <http://aaisp.blogspot.com/2008/10/bts-21st-century-network-apparently-not.html 
> >


Yeah, except Teredo and 6to4 solve that problem for us today and are  
enabled by default on Vista and are used by p2p applications.

Next.

--
Nathan Ward








More information about the NANOG mailing list