Public Assertions

Jeff Shultz jeffshultz at
Tue Nov 25 20:13:54 UTC 2008

Can anyone explain why we are being exposed to this? From either side?

bmanning at wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 08:56:43AM -0800, Bill Woodcock wrote:
>>       On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 bmanning at wrote:
>>     > 	If I may...  I am in possesion of your certified letter 
>>     > 	-AND- the signed acknowledgement that you received notice
>>     > 	that I have taken posession of said certified mail.
>>     > 
>>     > 	please get your facts straight, esp. when making formal 
>>     > 	replies to government inqueries.  it can only strengthen
>>     > 	your case if you tell the truth.
>> Equally but differently untruthful in my case.  Myself, I don't sit around 
>> my house all day, breathlessly anticipating a new missive from Dean.
>>                                 -Bill
> 	then what, pray tell, do you do to while away the hours?
> 	knit? route IP datagrams? carve elaborate totems from ancient redwoods?
> 	myself, I have taken up Portugese... such an expressive language.
> 	my instruction in the email above was derived from reading the submitted 
> 	comments to the DoC/NOI on securing the DNS.  telling us lies is one thing,
> 	factual mis-statements to the goverment is something else and i 
> 	fail to see how doing so helps ones cause.
> 	in the event that anyone has doubts, I will be glad to scan and post
> 	the evidence.  Dean, care to amend your statements?
> --bill

Jeff Shultz

More information about the NANOG mailing list