Prefix Hijack Tool Comaprision
a.harrowell at gmail.com
Thu Nov 13 19:56:26 UTC 2008
It may be the North American NOG, but it's been said before that it functions as a GNOG, G for Global. I don't think Brazil is insignificant. I respect Todd's work greatly, but I think he's wrong on this point.
- original message -
Subject: Re: Prefix Hijack Tool Comaprision
From: "Scott Weeks" <surfer at mauigateway.com>
Date: 13/11/2008 7:42 pm
--- todd at renesys.com wrote:
From: Todd Underwood <todd at renesys.com>
interesting, but it's not operationally significant. i would not
consider the fact that PHAS and Watchmy didn't alert any particular
criticism of them.
but perhaps there was something else to which you were referring.
I think he was just referring to and answering my question. I hope to see how these tools work in 'small' incidents as well as large-scale incidents. Knowing the tool's capabilities increases one's ability to assess the damage while troubleshooting.
More information about the NANOG