Prefix Hijack Tool Comaprision

Alexander Harrowell a.harrowell at gmail.com
Thu Nov 13 13:56:26 CST 2008


It may be the North American NOG, but it's been said before that it functions as a GNOG, G for Global. I don't think Brazil is insignificant. I respect Todd's work greatly, but I think he's wrong on this point.

- original message -
Subject:	Re: Prefix Hijack Tool Comaprision
From:	"Scott Weeks" <surfer at mauigateway.com>
Date:		13/11/2008 7:42 pm



--- todd at renesys.com wrote:
From: Todd Underwood <todd at renesys.com>

interesting, but it's not operationally significant.  i would not
consider the fact that PHAS and Watchmy didn't alert any particular
criticism of them.  

but perhaps there was something else to which you were referring.
----------------------------------



I think he was just referring to and answering my question.  I hope to see how these tools work in 'small' incidents as well as large-scale incidents.  Knowing the tool's capabilities increases one's ability to assess the damage while troubleshooting.

scott






More information about the NANOG mailing list