Sprint v. Cogent, some clarity & facts

Church, Charles cchurc05 at harris.com
Wed Nov 5 10:34:16 CST 2008


-----Original Message-----
From: michael.dillon at bt.com [mailto:michael.dillon at bt.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 10:52 AM
To: nanog at merit.edu
Subject: RE: Sprint v. Cogent, some clarity & facts


> what you're calling a political failure could be what others 
> call a rate war. 


I didn't really care about this, but now I'm curious.  Since their
peering was a 'trial', I'm assuming it hasn't always been there.  Prior
to Sprint and Cogent peering directly with each other, how did they
communicate?  Why was that functionality broken after they started
peering?




More information about the NANOG mailing list