[NANOG] OSPF minutia, and, technote publication venues
Nathan Ward
nanog at daork.net
Tue May 6 01:49:39 UTC 2008
On 6/05/2008, at 1:21 PM, Joe Abley wrote:
> On 5 May 2008, at 20:50, Nathan Ward wrote:
>
>> Perhaps what would make more sense here is Foundry (F5, etc.)
>> building
>> an anycast feature - anycast prefixes are withdrawn when a cluster
>> relying on that anycast prefix goes below a threshold.
>
> I'm not sure exactly what feature is required, here. f5s of my
> acquaintance are already very capable of making OSPF LSAs based on
> virtual servers' pools being non-empty. Do it on more than one f5 in
> the same area, and you're anycasting service availability with the
> current feature set.
Can they do it with BGP for Internet anycast?
> The general reason why people prefer to find alternative solutions
> rather than use dedicated load-balancers are that the dedicated load-
> balancers are hellishly more expensive than the $5 gigabit switch
> you probably already have in your garage.
The dedicated load balancers also talk BGP (well, ones I've played
with), so that does away with the need for a BGP speaking router.
--
Nathan Ward
More information about the NANOG
mailing list