[NANOG] Larger packets to save power, was: Re: would ip6 help us safeing energy ?
Niels Bakker
niels=nanog at bakker.net
Mon May 5 22:57:40 UTC 2008
* iljitsch at muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum) [Mon 05 May 2008, 10:09 CEST]:
> PS. Am I the only one who is annoyed by the reduction in usable
> subject space by the superfluous [NANOG]?
No, and I'm just as annoyed by the (non-McQ) footer with superfluous
information attached to each mail.
On 5 mei 2008, at 17:14, Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu wrote:
> Those of us who are *really* annoyed by stuff like that usually cook
> up a procmail recipe to strip it out.. :)
That will only lead to duplicates of "Re: " (before and after the tag)
in the Subject, I'm afraid.
-- Niels.
--
More information about the NANOG
mailing list