[NANOG] would ip6 help us safeing energy ?

Mon May 5 00:59:19 UTC 2008

Notwithstanding that fact that keepalives are a huge issue for  tiny 
battery powered devices. There's a false economy in assuming those 
packets wouldn't have to be sent with IPV6...

Marc Manthey wrote:
> evening all ,
> 
> found an  related article about  the power consumtion saving in ip6.
> 
> -
> 
> Up to 300 Megawatt Worth of Keepalive Messages to be Saved by IPv6?
> 
> http://www.circleid.com/posts/81072_megawatts_keepalive_ipv6/
> 
> http://www.niksula.hut.fi/~peronen/publications/haverinen_siren_eronen_vtc2007.pdf
> 
> 
> still interested in other links and publications
> 
> 
> regards
> 
> Marc
> 
> --
> "Use your imagination not to scare yourself to death
> but to inspire yourself to life."
> 
> Les enfants teribbles - research and deployment
> Marc Manthey - head of research and innovation
> Hildeboldplatz 1a D - 50672 Köln - Germany
> Tel.:0049-221-3558032
> Mobil:0049-1577-3329231
> jabber :marc at kgraff.net
> blog : http://www.let.de
> ipv6 http://www.ipsix.org
> xing : https://www.xing.com/profile/Marc_Manthey
> _______________________________________________
> NANOG mailing list
> NANOG at nanog.org
> http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
> 