Transition Planning for IPv6 as mandated by the US Govt

Tue Mar 18 03:21:37 UTC 2008

Randy Bush wrote:
>> I believe whoever shows off a functional NAT-PT device at the next NANOG
>> might get some praise. I heard it was a bit of a disaster.
>>     
>
> by the time the show got to apnic/apricot the week after nanog, we had
> the cisco implementation of nat-pt and totd working and it worked well.
>
> randy
>   
   And the NAT-PT implementation at NANOG (naptd) did seem
to work once some configuration issues were ironed out.   Unfortunately,
this was not resolved until the very end of the meeting.