ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs
morrowc.lists at gmail.com
Sat Jun 28 04:38:35 UTC 2008
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 12:34 AM, Gadi Evron <ge at linuxbox.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jun 2008, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:11 PM, Roger Marquis <marquis at roble.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>>>> I'd point out that FastFlux is actually sort of how Akamai does
>>>> it's job (inconsistent dns responses)
>>> That's not really fast flux. FF uses TTLs of just a few seconds with
>>> dozens of NS. Also, in practice, most FF NS are invalid. Not that FF
>>> a fixed definition...
>> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
>> www.yahoo.com. 24 IN CNAME www.yahoo-ht3.akadns.net.
>> www.yahoo-ht3.akadns.net. 57 IN A 184.108.40.206
>> akamai, 60 second TTL's... most of the FF things I've seen sit around
>> 300seconds for NS and for A records. either way, this is 60 seconds
>> which is fast enough.
> Interesting, I was under the impression anything less than 120 is
> effectively as good as 120.
I have not measured... I bet yahoo has though :) and/or Akamai.
There's a reason that these folks are doing this. Would be an
interesting presentation though eh?
More information about the NANOG