what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs)
billn at billn.net
Fri Jun 27 17:30:58 CDT 2008
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, David Conrad wrote:
> On Jun 27, 2008, at 10:57 AM, Bill Nash wrote:
>> I'd rather see ICANN spend time on current problems instead of making new
> Out of curiosity, what are the problems you feel ICANN should be spending its
> time on?
For starters, has Verisign ever been sanctioned by ICANN for it's
business practices, with stupid stuff occurring as late as what, this past
February (the front running debacle)? If ICANN is supposed to be
encouraging competition, et cetera, why is Verisign still in business?
Also, show me a single registrar that actually gaurantees their service.
Almost every registrar has boilerplate user agreements that shafts the
domain owner in the event of any failure, even if the registrar screws it
up. I'm not talking about some standard protection against user errors or
identidy theft, I'm talking about a genuine 'If our service breaks, you
get to keep both halves.'
Would you use a registrar with these terms of service? I bet you do.
Would you use them if you had a choice? I bet you wouldn't.
"Because certain states do not permit the limitation of elimination of
liability for certain types of damage, $registrar's liability shall be
limited to the smallest amount permitted by law. $registrar disclaims any
loss or liability resulting from:
1. access delays or interruptions to our web site or domain name
3. events beyond our control (i.e. acts of God);
4. the loss of registration or processing of a domain name or the use
of a domain name;
5. the failure for whatever reason to renew a domain name registration;
7. errors, omissions or misstatements;
8. deletion of, failure to store, or failure to process or act upon
9. processing of updated information to Your registration record;
11. errors taking place with regard to the processing of Your
I pulled a couple of lines out because they were things that I felt a
registrar might actually be indemnified, in the event of, but seriously.
How does an entire class of business truly serve the consumer with these
kinds of policies?
1. a person who keeps a record; an official recorder.
2. an agent of a bank, trust company, or other corporation who is
responsible for certifying and registering issues of securities.
Except for domain registrars, who are only really a registrar when they
make a mistake that could cost your entire commercial enterprise.
I'll be the first to admit there's been progress made on the front of
preventing domain theft and other shenanigans, but when it comes down to
it, running a domain registry doesn't seem to be in the best interests of
the primary consumers of such a product.
More information about the NANOG