ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs
tme at multicasttech.com
Fri Jun 27 11:13:10 CDT 2008
On Jun 27, 2008, at 6:44 AM, Jon Kibler wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>> On Jun 27, 2008, at 5:20 AM, Jon Kibler wrote:
>> Jeff Shultz wrote:
>>>>> Owen DeLong wrote:
>>>>> On that note, it will be very interesting to see who manages to
>>>>> the *.sucks TLD, and what they do with it.
>> Well, I guess this shoots in the foot Microsoft's name server best
>> practices of setting up your AD domain as foo.LOCAL, using the logic
>> that .LOCAL is safe because it cannot be resolved by the root name
>> Who wants to be the first to try to register *.local?
>>> They should have been following RFC 2606.
> Thinking about it a little more, what about the common use of
> 'localhost.localdomain' for 127.0.0.1 in most versions of *nix? I can
> just imagine the chaos that registering a *.localdomain TLD will
.localhost is already reserved through RFC 2606, so this should not be
a problem. To quote :
The ".localhost" TLD has traditionally been statically defined in host
DNS implementations as having an A record pointing to the loop back IP
address and is reserved for such use. Any other use would conflict
with widely deployed code which assumes this use.
> Methinks it is time to update RFC2606 to reflect common practices
> the new ICANN policies take effect.
If you can think of a list, it probably would...
> - --
> Jon R. Kibler
> Chief Technical Officer
> Advanced Systems Engineering Technology, Inc.
> Charleston, SC USA
> o: 843-849-8214
> c: 843-224-2494
> s: 843-564-4224
> My PGP Fingerprint is:
> BAA2 1F2C 5543 5D25 4636 A392 515C 5045 CF39 4253
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the NANOG