ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs
hannigan at verneglobal.com
Fri Jun 27 06:12:46 CDT 2008
The only reason I would have supported rejecting the proposal is the 'morality' language related to offensive TLD's. .
What's your take on that part of the process?
----- Original Message -----
From: Eric Brunner-Williams <brunner at nic-naa.net>
To: Martin Hannigan
Cc: nanog at nanog.org <nanog at nanog.org>; [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Fri Jun 27 10:57:15 2008
Subject: Re: ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs
I wasn't that impressed with Dave's remarks, but I heard them rather
than read them, which may have made a difference. I agree with your
views on the substance and spirit of Susan's and Wendy's statements.
This -- the new GTLD process -- was originally scheduled to get to
completion in 2003 and 2004 -- after the initial 2000 round.
Martin Hannigan wrote:
>> See pages 17 - 20 of https://par.icann.org/files/paris/gTLDUpdateParis-23jun08.pdf
>> See pages 22 - 25 of https://par.icann.org/files/paris/gTLDUpdateParis-23jun08.pdf
> I think that this is a good read as well, especially the comments by Dave Wodeley, Susan Crawford, and Wendy Seltzer.
More information about the NANOG