Latest instalment of the "hijacked /16s" story
justin at justinshore.com
Wed Jun 18 04:10:39 UTC 2008
Is the whole AS (33302) rogue like the AS advertising the SF Bay Packet
Radio block is? Looking at the WHOIS for some of the prefixes
advertised by both ASs, I see some common company names. That would
lead me to believe that 33302 is no better than 33211 but I can't
confirm that. Any takers?
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Another legacy /16, after the previous one - the sf bay packet radio /16
> This time 128.168/16 - and by the same group that seems to have acquired
> control of the earlier one.
More information about the NANOG