jgreco at ns.sol.net
Mon Jun 16 23:27:43 CDT 2008
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 10:26:41PM -0500, Joe Greco wrote:
> > Maybe we just wire in more tight places, but I find that it's somewhat
> > difficult to deal with more than about three excess inches when doing
> > in-frame wiring. I don't want to have to deal with excess.
> Perhaps it's because my wiring background, such as it is, runs more to
> video than networking...
> but doesn't *anyone* put service loops in anything anymore?
Assuming you're using "service loops" in the sense of allowing enough
cable to allow a server to slide out while running... usually in copper
building wiring, the term loosely refers to excess cable or whathaveyou
stuffed back into the conduit/cavity/box to allow for the fixture to be
pulled out and worked on.
When you've got a dense rack (think something like 30 1U servers, with a
minimum of 4 x Cat5/6/etc to each one), "service loops" are a great way
to significantly reduce your airflow. Think about how far you have to
pull a server out... is anything significantly less than 30" deep these
days? That means a lot of wire to store. When it isn't mission critical
that downtime be minimized to the second, it changes the perspective on
whether or not you need to be able to pull equipment while having it
So, if you really need the capability, an alternate method for providing
"service loops" is to simply swap out cables. You disconnect the precut,
swap in a nice long cable. Pull out your server. You lose connectivity
for a moment or two, but don't need to make arrangements for extra feet
of cable per each 1U.
Each situation will have tradeoffs. Pick appropriately, as always.
Joe Greco - sol.net Network Services - Milwaukee, WI - http://www.sol.net
"We call it the 'one bite at the apple' rule. Give me one chance [and] then I
won't contact you again." - Direct Marketing Ass'n position on e-mail spam(CNN)
With 24 million small businesses in the US alone, that's way too many apples.
More information about the NANOG