If bandwidth wasnt already cheap (!) enough ..
Deepak Jain
deepak at ai.net
Mon Jun 16 18:37:46 UTC 2008
IIRC, doesn't a three-year contract of this sort involve actually adding
*liabilities* to the books until the revenue is captured? I think this
may have more to do with run-rates or cutting attrition since so many
"allegedly" better networks are offering pricing at or below Cogent's
old/original pricing.
Disclaimer: Not a Cogent customer/investor.
DJ
James Blessing wrote:
> Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
>
>>> Service providers who buy between one Gigabit and 10 gigabits will
>>> enjoy a
>>> three-year contract rate of $5 a meg, and those that consume a full 10
>>> gigabit port can pay as little as $4 a meg on a three-year contract."
>
> A cynic would say that they are trying to book the revenues to raise
> some finance...
>
> J
More information about the NANOG
mailing list