patrick at zill.net
Thu Jul 31 10:49:53 CDT 2008
Matthew Petach wrote:
> I'm sure when Gmail gets close to the same number of users
> as Yahoo, they will discover how challenging and painful it is
> to support that many simultaneous short-lived SSL connections.
> It's much easier to support CPU intensive tasks like full-time
> SSL when you have a small user base; as that user base
> grows, the cost of providing that service continues to grow,
> often outpacing the revenue benefit it brings.
You're aware that certain chips, such as the UltraSparc T1 and T2 chips,
have on-board SSL acceleration functions that impose virtually zero
penalty on SSL encryption (though I suppose that setup/teardown is
handled by the main CPU)?
More information about the NANOG