[funsec] Subject line misleading. AT&T Pwned. Sweet Irony: Metasploit Creator a Victim of His Own Creation (fwd)

Thu Jul 31 04:25:18 UTC 2008

If you don't mind OpenDNS proxying all your Google searches, sure.  < http://blog.metasploit.com/2008/07/on-dns-attacks-in-wild-and-journalistic.html >

Personally, I would never use OpenDNS.  Tactics like that are not particularly acceptable in my book, well-meaning or not.  Not, however, trying to start a political debate - but OpenDNS does do a bit more than just act as a plain DNS resolver for you, and you should make that aware to anyone who uses it.

- S

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Hannigan [mailto:hannigan at gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 12:13 AM
To: Suresh Ramasubramanian; Gadi Evron; nanog at nanog.org
Subject: Re: [funsec] Subject line misleading. AT&T Pwned. Sweet Irony: Metasploit Creator a Victim of His Own Creation (fwd)

Not so quick.  Privacy policy?

-M<

On 7/30/08, Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 1:22 AM, Gadi Evron <ge at linuxbox.org> wrote:
>> I guess history decided the previous discussion in favor of vix. Although
>> I
>> doubt vix sees this compromise at ATT as a victory, but rather a loss.
>>
>> Note: HD has not been compromised.
>
> Well so if any of you uses an iphone to surf the net now's the time to
> see if an iphone's nameservers can be changed to opendns :)
>
>

--
Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com