Hardware capture platforms

Christopher Morrow morrowc.lists at gmail.com
Tue Jul 29 19:12:09 CDT 2008


On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 12:35 AM, Jared Mauch <jared at puck.nether.net> wrote:
> Check out packet forensics depending on what your ultimate requirements are.
>

I would also add a 'see packet forensics'...

> On Jul 29, 2008, at 7:10 PM, "John A. Kilpatrick" <john at hypergeek.net>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> We've deployed a bunch taps in our network and now we need a platform on
>> which to capture the data.  Our bandwidth is currently pretty low but I've
>> got 8 links to tap, which means I need 16 ports.  Has anyone done any
>> research on doing accurate packet capture with commodity hardware?
>>
>>
>> --
>>                              John A. Kilpatrick
>> john at hypergeek.net                Email|     http://www.hypergeek.net/
>> john-page at hypergeek.net      Text pages|          ICQ: 19147504
>>                remember:  no obstacles/only challenges
>>
>>
>
>




More information about the NANOG mailing list