Software router state of the art
Andrew D Kirch
trelane at trelane.net
Mon Jul 28 21:30:34 UTC 2008
Rev. Jeffrey Paul wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:08:32PM +0100, michael.dillon at bt.com wrote:
>> But if you want free suggestions, then you'll have to put up with
>> half answers, vendor fanboys, and the usual ruckus of NANOG.
> As much as I hate to contribute to the problem, I'd like to point out
> that the barrage of useless, off-topic, empty traffic on this list in
> the last week is, in my estimation, quite a bit above the "usual" ruckus
> of NANOG.
> While I'm not one to thunk down the rulebook, can you all collectively
> knock it off?
I haven't followed the other threads in the last week, but I don't think
that a discussion of routers is off topic. While Michael's opinion was
expressed in a fairly tongue-in-cheek method as would be required by his
response, I don't see anything offtopic, perhaps just hotly worded.
More information about the NANOG