Cisco vs Adtran vs Juniper
heighway at gmail.com
Fri Jul 18 10:21:48 CDT 2008
On your last note Cisco also offers a all-in-one with all the features you
talked about and more. They are called UC500's.
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Paul Stewart <pstewart at nexicomgroup.net>
> Hi there..
> I'm looking for some constructive feedback on **real world** experiences
> We're primarily a Cisco shop today - our core and distribution are all
> Cisco driven and will continue to be (won't change that so not worth
> discussing today).
> My question is oriented towards two other markets primarily:
> Security Devices
> Remote Office/Customer Site Devices
> Let me elaborate a bit more...
> Security - today, we've been deploying Cisco ASA boxes (was PIX before
> that) with pretty good success. However, in comparison to Juniper the
> Cisco boxes are *really* expensive - at least to us anyways. Juniper
> has nice products so I'm looking at proposing a solution internally to
> move towards the Juniper security appliances. Feedback from folks on
> them vs Cisco ASA??
> Remote Office/Customer Site Devices - today, we do a lot of "managed
> routers" to customer sites. Again, cost driven, I'm being pushed
> towards looking at Adtran devices for customer sites that we maintain.
> I have nothing against Adtran but haven't viewed them to date as being
> in the same "arena" as Cisco/Juniper etc.. these routers are mainly
> providing basic firewalling/NAT and some very small VPN activity at
> To take this one step further, some of our voice folks are really
> enjoying the Adtran boxes as it offers an "all in one solution" which is
> a router, firewall, "voice" box (many options - PRI handoff, T1,
> FXS/FXO) and in some of their boxes 24 POE switch ports as well. This
> is kinda cool I'll admit but the approach in the past has been to drop
> in a Cisco router, Adtran for voice applications, and then Cisco POE
> switches if required. This is very costly compared to Adtran's all in
> one approach.... so am I being stubborn on this or is the Adtran
> products in this case in the same league?? I had some terrible track
> record with Adtran a number of years ago so my back gets up when their
> name is mentioned...;)
> Any feedback would be very appreciated - we're going to have meetings
> internally in the next while to decide which product lines fit with
> which service offerings the best....
> "The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
> which it is addressed and contains confidential and/or privileged material.
> If you received this in error, please contact the sender immediately and
> then destroy this transmission, including all attachments, without copying,
> distributing or disclosing same. Thank you."
More information about the NANOG