what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens upPandora's Box of
Tomas L. Byrnes
tomb at byrneit.net
Tue Jul 1 19:25:38 UTC 2008
Shouldn't we take all the ICANNt and DNS Related stuff to
From: Jay R. Ashworth [mailto:jra at baylink.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 11:48 AM
To: nanog at nanog.org
Subject: Re: what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens
upPandora's Box of
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 12:04:57PM +0100, Roland Perry wrote:
> In article <20080630212216.GJ8195 at cgi.jachomes.com>, Jay R. Ashworth
> <jra at baylink.com> writes
> >The Domain Name System is not now, and never has been, away to *find*
> >things, anymore than 123 Elm St, Worcester MA is a way to *find* a
> What about "1 Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA" ?
Or 1 Tech Data Drive, Largo, or 1 Infinite Loop; yeah, there are lots of
good examples of why addresses are random and shouldn't be used to
*locate* things... except as keys into directories.
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink
jra at baylink.com
Designer The Things I Think
Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com
St Petersburg FL USA http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727
Those who cast the vote decide nothing.
Those who count the vote decide everything.
-- (Joseph Stalin)
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 8.0.101 / Virus Database: 270.4.3/1528 - Release Date: 7/1/2008
More information about the NANOG