Stupid Question: Network Abuse RFC?

Paul Ferguson fergdawg at netzero.net
Sun Jan 13 06:08:17 UTC 2008


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

So, someone else (Thanks, by the way -- this is the one I was looking
for) pointed me to RFC3013/BCP46:

http://rfc-editor.org/cgi-bin/rfcdoctype.pl?loc=RFC&letsgo=3013&type=http&f
ile_format=txt

In addition to RFC2142, it would appear that these are largely
ignored just as much as any other operational IETF documents.

That's a shame.

$.02,

- - ferg

p.s. Thanks to everyone for their replies.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.3 (Build 3017)

wj8DBQFHiarRq1pz9mNUZTMRAkF1AKDMzsJlzSLPPVkR2GMrUXN/CDFBXgCguQy4
C9PMJ0Jl9a9XJjEZ9aqLIUY=
=G7gb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawg(at)netzero.net
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/





More information about the NANOG mailing list