Stupid Question: Network Abuse RFC?
Paul Ferguson
fergdawg at netzero.net
Sun Jan 13 06:08:17 UTC 2008
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
So, someone else (Thanks, by the way -- this is the one I was looking
for) pointed me to RFC3013/BCP46:
http://rfc-editor.org/cgi-bin/rfcdoctype.pl?loc=RFC&letsgo=3013&type=http&f
ile_format=txt
In addition to RFC2142, it would appear that these are largely
ignored just as much as any other operational IETF documents.
That's a shame.
$.02,
- - ferg
p.s. Thanks to everyone for their replies.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.3 (Build 3017)
wj8DBQFHiarRq1pz9mNUZTMRAkF1AKDMzsJlzSLPPVkR2GMrUXN/CDFBXgCguQy4
C9PMJ0Jl9a9XJjEZ9aqLIUY=
=G7gb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
Engineering Architecture for the Internet
fergdawg(at)netzero.net
ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
More information about the NANOG
mailing list