[admin] Re: SMTP addresses in <>
Martin Hannigan
hannigan at gmail.com
Fri Jan 4 18:33:05 UTC 2008
Folks,
Let's bring this one to closure. The authors question is answered and
this is backing itself into an endless thread with arguments better
suited for the IETF vs. NANOG.
Best Regards,
Martin Hannigan
NANOG Mailing List Committee
On Jan 4, 2008 1:02 PM, Alexander Harrowell <a.harrowell at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 4, 2008 5:52 PM, Andrew Sullivan <andrew at ca.afilias.info> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > I completely agree. If it weren't for that philosophy, we wouldn't
> > have an email problem at all.
> >
> > A
> >
>
> Because....we wouldn't have e-mail? Consider the pain of getting worldwide
> interoperability for a "notmail" system that insisted on strict
> validation...
>
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list