YouTube IP Hijacking

Rick Astley jnanog at gmail.com
Mon Feb 25 06:20:08 UTC 2008


It does sort of shed light on a sobering fact that some of the PCCW's of the
world are not using proper filtering, and with a coordinated effort, someone
could inject a large number of routes into the global routing table through
them effectively taking offline much of the Internet.

Anything more specific than a /24 would get blocked by many filters, so some
of the "high target" sites may want to announce their mission critical IP
space as /24 and avoid using prepends.

If the PCCW's of the world are not going to sanity check inbound
announcements from some of their peers, they should at least be prepending
them to help fight abuse of this nature (accidental or not).

Also, IANAL, but there seems to be a misconception of what AT&T's DDoS
patent (application 20060031575) covers. The patent is not simply about
blackholing an IP address, it claims "Such a selective black-holing scheme
can be used to allow some traffic to continue in route to the IP address
under attack, while other traffic is diverted."

So simply blackholing everything destined to an IP address does not seem to
conflict with the patent.

As a side note, it will be interesting to see how the youtube posters
respond to this.
If Pakistan thought the site was offensive before, I doubt they will be
amused at the backlash that will probably occur as the result of this.

I have a feeling youtubers will be trying to 1up each other for most
offensive video.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20080225/e7894ead/attachment.html>


More information about the NANOG mailing list