Question on the topology of Internet Exchange Points
Andy Davidson
andy at nosignal.org
Thu Feb 14 20:44:40 UTC 2008
On 14 Feb 2008, at 17:02, Kai Chen wrote:
> A typical Internet Exchange Point (IXP) consists of one or more
> network switches, to which each of the participating ISPs connect.
> We call it the exchange-based topology. My question is if some
> current IXPs use directly-connected topology, in which ISPs just
> connect to each other by direct link, not through a network switch??
> If so, what's the percentage of this directly-connected case?
ISPs use a "direct link" (PNI) all the time to peer, and they don't
need to be a member/customer of an internet exchange point to do so.
In fact, the network you want to peer with might not be available at
your local IXP even though they're in your local carrier hotel - then
it becomes pretty much the only way to peer.
In London, the LINX offer switched *and* unswitched connectivity
between members - you can rent fibers from them in order to perform
PNI with other members. That the exchange offer this is unusual, and
it's offered as an additional service, in order to smooth the process
of organising interconnection between member organisations. [www.linx.net
]
We (LONAP) don't offer PNI services, and only offer the conventional
switch ports, which members normally want so that they can get access
to our peering lan and swap some traffic. [www.lonap.net] All
exchanges offer this connectivity model. We offer private CUG and
member-to-member private VLANs, which is similar, but still passes
through the switch fabric.
Best wishes
Andy
More information about the NANOG
mailing list