Argument for cleaning up BGP announcements
Barry Greene (bgreene)
bgreene at cisco.com
Fri Feb 1 04:02:24 UTC 2008
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Check out:
http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0302/cidr.html
I still think the CIDR Report only has a impact if you have a team of
volunteers knocking people on the side of the head and getting them
to pay attention. People look at the top, but try looking at the
bottom 2/3.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nanog at merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog at merit.edu] On
> Behalf Of Silas Moeckel
> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 4:02 PM
> To: nanog at merit.edu
> Subject: Argument for cleaning up BGP announcements
>
>
> I have the misfortune of attempting to make the argument to
> one of the top 20 worst offenders on the CIDR report
> aggregation summary. If anybody has some good PHB fodder and
> info on general bad things that can happen by doing things
> this way please email me off list. I'll summarize what I get
> in a few days. There is no major TE or similar reason for
> them to be on there just bad practices since the last time I
> restructured there network. Obviously since things work
> today they are hesitant to change.
>
> Silas Moeckel
> DSM Inc.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.1
iQA/AwUBR6KZ0L/UEA/xivvmEQLtCwCaAy2F8rp5IbfbfWzY3kDABJ6ejfEAn0Ff
pcaKf5KH8FDFjtkQ6l3ABiI4
=REYG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the NANOG
mailing list