Advice requested for OpenBSD vs. Linux/OpenBGP vs. Quagga router deployment.

Scott Francis darkuncle at gmail.com
Wed Dec 17 11:53:20 CST 2008


On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 9:37 AM, Marc Runkel <MRunkel at untangle.com> wrote:
[snip]
> Greetings all,
>
> We are a software development firm that currently delivers our install ISOs via Sourceforge.
> We need to start serving them ourselves for marketing reasons and are therefore increasing
> our bandwidth and getting a 2nd ISP in our datacenter.  Both ISPs will be delivering
> 100mbit/sec links.  We don't expect to increase that for the next year or so and expect
> average traffic to be about 40-60mbit/sec.
>
> We are planning to run two OpenBSD based firewalls (with CARP and pf) running OpenBGP
> in order to connect to the two ISPs.
>
> I saw from previous email that Quagga was recommended as opposed to OpenBGP.  Any
> further comments on that?  Also,  any comments on the choice of OpenBSD vs. Linux?

IMO, the performance and utility of OpenBSD as a routing/networking
platform is unmatched by any other open source platform. OpenBGPD
(recent 4-byte ASN issues notwithstanding) has been very stable for us
in production (running roughly equivalent traffic levels to what
you're discussing), and the best part is that you get stateful
transparent failover with CARP, filtering/redirection with pf, load
balancing all the way up through layer7 with relayd, and a host of
other excellent tools for the network engineer's toolkit, all
included, and all integrated. Then of course there's the wider issues
of OpenBSD's track record on security and networking in comparison
with the other OSS platforms, the smaller pool of folks to draw on who
are experienced in running and tuning OpenBSD (although any reasonably
competent UNIX admin should be able to adapt to it in a few days,
given the generally clean layout and high degree of internal
consistency).

advocacy at openbsd.org is down the hall, so I'll stop there. :)

As Adrian said, there are other platforms with better SMP
implementations ... but my experience has been that for small and
mid-size sites, CPU utilization on a reasonably modern x86-based
router is the least of one's worries.
-- 
[email protected]{gmail.com,darkuncle.net} || 0x5537F527
  http://darkuncle.net/pubkey.asc for public key




More information about the NANOG mailing list