Netblock reassigned from Chile to US ISP...
fergdawgster at gmail.com
Sat Dec 13 01:43:19 CST 2008
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:36 PM, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote:
>> So having said all that, what exactly was your point? :-)
> bluff calling.
> that you can not tell us if that specific host is a proxy means that this
> is pretty much bs.
> that you and your no-girls-allowed club have some list of things you
> think are proxies (sure would be nice to have a definition thereof),
> doeth not make a rigorous, testable, and scalable system.
Gee, I seem to have said that before regarding nsp-sec.
Look it, whatever you may think, there's certainly no "old boys club"
factor at work here, but I'm certainly not going to put up a portal where
anyone and their grandmother can check for known open proxies -- there is
already enough of that -- and that actually is not the point.
That chip on your shoulder must be getting pretty heavy... so forget it.
- - ferg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.3 (Build 3017)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
Engineering Architecture for the Internet
ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
More information about the NANOG