It's Ars Tech's turn to bang the IPv4 exhaustion drum

Jay R. Ashworth jra at baylink.com
Mon Aug 18 18:47:07 CDT 2008


On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 08:57:27PM +0200, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> >operational content: Is anyone significantly redesigning the way they 
> >route/etc to take advantage of any hooks that IPv6 provides-for (even if 
> >its a proprietary implementation)? As far as I can tell, most people are 
> >just implementing it as IPv4 with a lot of bits (i.e. /126s for link 
> >interfaces, etc).
> 
> Yes, there are those of us who want to save number of routes and 
> "spending" IPv6 addresses to save on TCAM and convergence time.
> 
> Using /112 for link networks to make the last octet ::1 and ::2 for links 
> also makes sense from the human perspective.

Well, if y'all want a place to put this hints, I got a whole IPv6y
section over here:

	http://bestpractices.wikia.com

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                                                jra at baylink.com
Designer                +-Internetworking------+---------+            RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates   |  Best Practices Wiki |         |             '87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA    +-http://bestpractices.wikia.com-+     +1 727 647 1274

      If you can read this... thank a system administrator.  Or two.  --me




More information about the NANOG mailing list