SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6
Scott Weeks
surfer at mauigateway.com
Mon Aug 18 19:52:50 UTC 2008
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Weeks [mailto:surfer at mauigateway.com]
---------- trejrco at gmail.com wrote: ------------
As a general rule, most clients are following the "If we gave them static
IPv4 addresses we will give them static IPv6 addresses" (infrastructure,
servers, etc). The whole SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6 is a separate (albeit
related) conversation ...
----------------------------------------------------
I'm still an IPv6 wussie and would like to learn more before moving forward,
so would anyone care to share info on experiences with this decision?
-- hcb at netcases.net wrote:
From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <hcb at netcases.net>
To try to stay operational about this <snip>
------------------------
Seeing Howard's quick response saying "To try to stay operational about this..." makes me realize I may have inadvertently invited a religious flame fest.
Please! Operational content and hands-on experiences only to the best of your ability. I want to learn from this, not delete the whole thread.
scott
More information about the NANOG
mailing list