route policy (Re: Public shaming list for ISPs announcing other ISPs IP space by mistake)
sandy at tislabs.com
Fri Aug 15 08:39:30 CDT 2008
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 13:56:09 +0300 (EEST), Pekka Savola wrote:
>I'm not sure I follow. Many of these aliens are in fact registered in
>RADB, so AFAICS, there that is no reason for them to be registered in
>On the other hand, some want to register them in RIPE DB because some
>operators just want to use RIPE DB e.g. for data consistency etc.
>reasons. But putting data without practically any authorization in
>RIPE DB doesn't seem to be a useful model in the long run.
As I understand things, the "without practically any authorization"
model holds for *everything* registered in the RADB. Right?
If that's not a useful model for the RIPE DB, what about the RADB?
P.S. Not to pick on the RADB. Most IRRs, as I understand it,
enforce little in the way of authorization. It's just that the RADB
More information about the NANOG